Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults.

OBJECTIVES: Skull morphology and growth patterns are essential for orthodontic treatment, impacting clinical decision making. We aimed to determine the association of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on midface parameters as measured in 3D CT datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After sample size calculation, a total of 240 fully dentulous patients between 20 and 79 years of age (mean age: 42 ± 15), who had received a CT of the skull within the scope of trauma diagnosis or intracranial bleeding, were retrospectively selected. On the basis of cephalometric analysis, using MPR reconstructions, patients were subdivided into three different vertical skull configurations (brachyfacial, mesofacial, dolichofacial) and the respective skeletal Class I, II, and III relationships. Anatomic parameters were measured using a three-dimensional post-processing console: the thickness of the maxillary and palatine bones as well as the alveolar crest, maxillary body and sutural length, width and height of the hard palate, maxillary facial wall thickness, and masseter muscle thickness and length. RESULTS: Individuals with brachyfacial configurations had a significantly increased palatal and alveolar ridge thicknesses compared to those with dolichofacial- or mesofacial configurations. Brachyfacial configurations presented a significantly increased length and thickness of the masseter muscle (4.599 cm; 1.526 cm) than mesofacial (4.431 cm; 1.466 cm) and dolichofacial configurations (4.405 cm; 1.397 cm) (p < 0.001). Individuals with a skeletal Class III had a significantly shorter palatal length (5.313 cm) than those with Class I (5.406 cm) and Class II (5.404 cm) (p < 0.01). Sutural length was also significantly shorter in Class III (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal configurations have an impact on parameters of the bony skull. Also, measurable adaptations of the muscular phenotype could result. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The association between viscerocranial morphology and midface anatomy might be beneficial for tailoring orthodontic appliances to individual anatomy and planning cortically anchored orthodontic appliances.

The comparison of the morphology of the mid-palatal suture between edentulous individuals and dentate jaws shows morphological differences.

BACKGROUND: A profound understanding of the evolution and anatomy of the viscero- and neurocranium is quintessentially important for orthodontists. This particularly alludes to structures, which are directly targeted by orthodontic therapy such as the maxilla and the mid-palatal suture. The anatomy of the mid-palatal suture of toothed individuals is well described, whereas little is known about sutures' morphological changes after tooth loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the edentulous mid-palatal suture by means of histologic and histomorphometric analysis. METHODS: Ten mid-palatal sutures of edentulous donors as well as six age- and sex matched dentulous controls were examined. For the histological and histomorphometric analysis (sutural width, obliteration, vascularization and interdigitation) conventional staining protocols (HE, Movat-Pentachrome, Sirius Red) and immunofluorescence (vWF, TRAP) were performed. Histomorphometric analysis was carried out using NIS-elements imaging software. RESULTS: When compared to dentulous controls, the edentulous investigation group showed a decreased vascularization and sutural width as well as an increased sutural obliteration. Notably, a high variability and inhomogeneity within regard the histomorphometric parameters was seen in edentulous samples. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-palatal suture of edentulous individuals showed significant morphological differences compared to individuals with toothed jaws. The loss of teeth and thereby functional loading seems to have a considerable impact on sutures' morphology.

Halitosis in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Patients - a Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Halitosis is a relatively inhomogeneous pathology with an extremely high prevalence in the population. Potential risk factors for bad breath include bacterial decomposition of organic material as well as numerous general and systemic diseases. The aim of the present study was to analyze whether certain subgroups of oral and maxillofacial surgery patients have a higher risk of halitosis. Further the impact of halitosis on the patient's quality of life was ascertained. METHODS: A total of 127 oral and maxillofacial patients aged between 19 and 86 years were enrolled in this study. On account of their underlining disease, patients were divided into five different investigation groups. The dental examination comprised tongue coating, periodontal screening index (PSI), gingival index (GI), PI (plaque index), DMF-T values as well as non-stimulated saliva flow rates. Halitosis was monitored both organoleptically according to Rosenberg and instrumentally by means of a Halimeter®, which records the volatile sulfur compounds (VSC values in ppm). Patients were further asked to fill out questionnaires regarding their medical history and oral hygiene, oral health (OHIP-14), and quality of life (BDI-II). RESULTS: Halitosis values, which were recorded by a Halimeter® correlated with the objective Rosenberg golden standard method. Furthermore, halitosis values correlated with elevated PSI, GI, and DMF-T values as well as the degree of tongue coating. Patients with oral cancer showed significantly higher VSC values compared to all other groups. No difference in VSC values could be found between all other patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Halimeter® could be validated as a suitable method for determining halitosis in oral and maxillofacial patients. The significantly increased halitosis values in cancer patients as opposed to all other patient groups suggests the potential of halitosis VSC values as a potential screening method. The development of non-invasive breath tests for diagnosis could be subject of future research.